Heterogeneity in practices to reduce the risk of transmission of Clostridioides difficile in healthcare settings: a survey of ESCMID Study Group for Clostridioides difficile (ESGCD) members.

Clostridioides difficile is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections. The main objective was to assess the current landscape of CDI infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. An anonymous survey of IPC practices for CDI was conducted between July 25 and October 31, 2022. Precautions for symptomatic patients were applicable for 75.9% and were discontinued 48 h minimum after the resolution of diarrhea for 40.7% of respondents. Daily cleaning of CDI patients' rooms was reported by 23 (42.6%). There was unexpected heterogeneity in IPC practices regarding the hospital management of CDI.

Update on microbiota-derived therapies for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections.

BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the standard treatment for patients with multiple recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Recently, new commercially developed human microbiota-derived medicinal products have been evaluated and Food and Drug Administration-approved with considerable differences in terms of composition, administration, and targeted populations. OBJECTIVES: To review available data on the different microbiota-derived treatments at the stage of advanced clinical evaluation and research in rCDI in comparison with FMT. SOURCES: Phase II or III trials evaluating a microbiota-derived medicinal product to prevent rCDI. CONTENT: Two commercial microbiota-derived medicinal products are approved by the Food and Drug Administration: Rebyota (RBX2660 Ferring Pharmaceuticals, marketed in the United States) and VOWST (SER-109 -Seres Therapeutics, marketed in the United States), whereas VE303 (Vedanta Biosciences Inc) will be studied in phase III trial. RBX2660 and SER-109 are based on the processing of stools from healthy donors, whereas VE303 consists of a defined bacterial consortium originating from human stools and produced from clonal cell banks. All have proven efficacy to prevent rCDI compared with placebo in patients considered at high risk of recurrence. However, the heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria, and the time between each episode and CDI diagnostics makes direct comparison between trials difficult. The differences regarding the risk of recurrence between the treatment and placebo arms were lower than previously described for FMT (FMT: Δ = 50.5%; RBX2660-phase III: Δ = 13.1%; SER-109-phase III: Δ = 28%; high-dose VE303-phase-II: Δ = 31.7%). All treatments presented a good overall safety profile with mainly mild gastrointestinal symptoms. IMPLICATIONS: Stool-derived products and bacterial consortia need to be clearly distinguished in terms of product characterization and their associated risks with specific long-term post-marketing evaluation similar to registries used for FMT. Their place in the therapeutic strategy for patients with rCDI requires further studies to determine the most appropriate patient population and administration route to prevent rCDI.

Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Slovakia, 2020 - Emergence of an Epidemic USA300 Clone in Community and Hospitals.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a leading cause of health care-associated infections. Additionally, over the decades, the spread of community-associated (CA-MRSA) clones has become a serious problem. The aim of this study was to gain data on the current epidemiology of MRSA in Slovakia. Between January 2020 and March 2020, single-patient MRSA isolates (invasive and/or colonizing) were collected in Slovakia from hospitalized inpatients (16 hospitals) or outpatients (77 cities). Isolates were characterized via antimicrobial susceptibility testing, spa typing, SCCmec typing, the detection of mecA/mecC, genes coding for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), and the arcA gene (part of the arginine catabolic mobile element [ACME]). Out of 412 isolates, 167 and 245 originated from hospitalized patients and outpatients, respectively. Inpatients were most likely older (P < 0.001) and carried a strain exhibiting multiple resistance (P = 0.015). Isolates were frequently resistant to erythromycin (n = 320), clindamycin (n = 268), and ciprofloxacin/norfloxacin (n = 261). 55 isolates were resistant to oxacillin/cefoxitin only. By clonal structure, CC5-MRSA-II (n = 106; spa types t003, t014), CC22-MRSA-IV (n = 75; t032), and CC8-MRSA-IV (n = 65; t008) were the most frequent. We identified PVL in 72 isolates (17.48%; 17/412), with the majority belonging to CC8-MRSA-IV (n = 55; arcA+; t008, t622; the USA300 CA-MRSA clone) and CC5-MRSA-IV (n = 13; t311, t323). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the epidemiology of MRSA in Slovakia. The presence of the epidemic HA-MRSA clones CC5-MRSA-II and CC22-MRSA-IV was found, as was, importantly, the emergence of the global epidemic USA300 CA-MRSA clone. The extensive spread of USA300 among inpatients and outpatients across the Slovakian regions warrants further investigation. IMPORTANCE The epidemiology of MRSA is characterized by the rise and fall of epidemic clones. Understanding the spread, as well as the evolution of successful MRSA clones, depends on the knowledge of global MRSA epidemiology. However, basic knowledge about MRSA epidemiology is still fragmented or completely missing in some parts of the world. This is the first study of MRSA epidemiology in Slovakia to identify the presence of the epidemic HA-MRSA clones CC5-MRSA-II and CC22-MRSA-IV and, importantly and unexpectedly, the emergence of the global epidemic USA300 CA-MRSA clone in the Slovakian community and hospitals. So far, USA300 has failed to spread in Europe, and this study documents an extensive spread of this epidemic clone in a European country for the first time.

Hospital and community wastewater as a source of multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing Escherichia coli.

Introduction: Hospitals and wastewater are recognized hot spots for the selection and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to the environment, but the total participation of hospitals in the spread of nosocomial pathogens to municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and adjacent rivers had not previously been revealed. Methods: We used a combination of culturing and whole-genome sequencing to explore the transmission routes of Escherichia coli from hospitalized patients suffering from urinary tract infections (UTI) via wastewater to the environment. Samples were collected in two periods in three locations (A, B, and C) and cultured on selective antibiotic-enhanced plates. Results: In total, 408 E. coli isolates were obtained from patients with UTI (n=81), raw hospital sewage (n=73), WWTPs inflow (n=96)/outflow (n=106), and river upstream (n=21)/downstream (n=31) of WWTPs. The majority of the isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), mainly CTX-M-15, and showed multidrug resistance (MDR) profiles. Seven carbapenemase-producing isolates with GES-5 or OXA-244 were obtained in two locations from wastewater and river samples. Isolates were assigned to 74 different sequence types (ST), with the predominance of ST131 (n=80) found in all sources including rivers. Extraintestinal pathogenic lineages frequently found in hospital sewage (ST10, ST38, and ST69) were also found in river water. Despite generally high genetic diversity, phylogenetic analysis of ST10, ST295, and ST744 showed highly related isolates (SNP 0-18) from different sources, providing the evidence for the transmission of resistant strains through WWTPs to surface waters. Discussion: Results of this study suggest that 1) UTI share a minor participation in hospitals wastewaters; 2) a high diversity of STs and phylogenetic groups in municipal wastewaters derive from the urban influence rather than hospitals; and 3) pathogenic lineages and bacteria with emerging resistance genotypes associated with hospitals spread into surface waters. Our study highlights the contribution of hospital and municipal wastewater to the transmission of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing E. coli with MDR profiles to the environment.

Clostridioides difficile infections were predominantly driven by fluoroquinolone-resistant Clostridioides difficile ribotypes 176 and 001 in Slovakia in 2018-2019.

AIM: To investigate the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in Slovakian hospitals after the emergence of ribotype 176 (027-like) in 2016. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2019, European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention CDI surveillance protocol v2.3 was applied to 14 hospitals, with additional data collected on recent antimicrobial use and the characterization of C. difficile isolates. RESULTS: The mean hospital incidence of CDI was 4.1 cases per 10,000 patient bed-days. One hundred and five (27.6%) in-hospital deaths were reported among the 381 cases. Antimicrobial treatment within the previous 4 weeks was recorded in 90.5% (333/368) of cases. Ribotype (RT)176 was detected in 50% (n=185/370, 14 hospitals) and RT001 was detected in 34.6% (n=128/370,13/14 hospitals) of cases with RT data. Overall, 86% (n=318/370) of isolates were resistant to moxifloxacin by Thr82Ile in GyrA (99.7%). Multi-locus variable tandem repeat analysis showed clonal relatedness of predominant RTs within and between hospitals. Seven of 14 sequenced RT176 isolates and five of 13 RT001 isolates showed between zero and three allelic differences by whole-genome multi-locus sequence typing. The majority of sequenced isolates (24/27) carried the erm(B) gene and 16/27 also carried the aac(6')-aph(2'') gene with the corresponding antimicrobial susceptibility phenotypes. Nine RT176 strains carried the cfr(E)gene and one RT001 strain carried the cfr(C) gene, but without linezolid resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The newly-predominant RT176 and endemic RT001 are driving the epidemiology of CDI in Slovakia. In addition to fluoroquinolones, the use of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics can represent another driving force for the spread of these epidemic lineages. In C. difficile, linezolid resistance should be confirmed phenotypically in strains with detected cfr gene(s).

Clostridioides difficile infection: are the three currently used antibiotic treatment options equal from pharmacological and microbiological points of view?

Recently, the recommendations for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) have been updated. However, in addition to the clinical efficacy data, the drug of choice should ideally represent optimal antimicrobial stewardship, with an emphasis on rapid restoration of the gut microbiota to minimize the risk of infection relapses. Oral administration of metronidazole results in low concentration in stool, and interaction with fecal microbiota reduces its antimicrobial bioactivity. Reported elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations of metronidazole in epidemic C. difficile ribotypes and the emergence of plasmid-mediated resistance to metronidazole represent additional potential risks for clinical failure. If metronidazole is the only CDI treatment option, antimicrobial susceptibility testing on agar containing heme should be performed in C. difficile isolate. Compared with metronidazole, oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin reach very high concentrations in the stool, and therefore can quickly reduce C. difficile shedding. Health care facilities with higher CDI incidence and/or occurrence of epidemic ribotypes should not use metronidazole because prolonged C. difficile shedding can increase the risk for further C. difficile transmission. Only fidaxomicin has a narrow spectrum of antimicrobial activity, which might be, together with persistence on spores, the main contributing factor to reduce the recurrent CDI rates.

The evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samples.

BACKGROUND: The rapid diagnostics tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen vary in their sensitivities, and moreover, genomic mutations may further affect the performance of the assays. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of an automated antigen assay and compare its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant positive clinical samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analytical performance of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was evaluated on a population of community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic investigated by the RT-qPCR Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were evaluated on prospective 621 nasopharyngeal swabs along with oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity regarding variants determined by the Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Variant assays was analysed in additional, retrospective 158 Delta and 59 Omicron samples. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of the antigen test in prospective samples was 77.9% (113/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.3-84.4) with the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 98.8-100). Regarding the variant, the sensitivity was higher in Omicron-variant samples, 93.2% (55/59; 95% CI 83.5-98.1), compared to Delta-variant samples, 71.5% (113/158; 95% CI 63.8-78.4; p = .001). CONCLUSION: In community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic, the automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test showed high sensitivity over 98.0% in subgroup samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25. Regarding the variant, the antigen test sensitivity was higher in the Omicron-variant samples compared to the Delta-variant samples. The analytical performance of the antigen test can differ between the SARS-CoV-2 variants, and a re-evaluation should be performed for new circulating lineages.

Detection of Plasmid-Mediated Resistance to Metronidazole in Clostridioides difficile from River Water.

Clostridioides difficile is one of the most important human pathogens. The identification of its possible sources is important for the understanding of C. difficile infection (CDI) epidemiology. A total of 16 water samples from wastewater and surface water in South Moravia in the Czech Republic and 82 samples of fish and gulls were collected between May and July 2019. C. difficile isolates were cultured by direct plating and after enrichment on chromogenic media. Susceptibility testing to eight antimicrobials was performed by Etest. C. difficile isolates were characterized by ribotyping, multilocus sequence typing, multilocus tandem repeats analysis, and toxin gene detection. Samples from fish and gulls were C. difficile negative; a total of 15 C. difficile isolates from 8 out of 16 water samples were cultured (6 out of 14 surface water samples yielded 6 isolates, and 2 out of 2 wastewater samples yielded 9 isolates). Direct plating was culture positive in 6 out of 16 samples (12 isolates), and enrichment culture was positive in an additional 2 out of 16 samples (3 isolates). Twelve different ribotyping profiles and 14 sequence types of clades 1, 4, and 5 were identified. Five isolates did not carry genes for toxins, and eight isolates carried genes for toxins A and B; the remaining two isolates (RT078) carried the genes for toxins A, B, and binary. All C. difficile isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin, moxifloxacin, tetracycline, and vancomycin and resistant to ciprofloxacin. A high level of erythromycin resistance (>256 mg/L) was detected in eight isolates. Clindamycin resistance was found in 14 isolates, 6 of which showed a high level of resistance (>256 mg/L) and carried ermB. Surprisingly, one isolate (RT010, ST15) showed resistance to metronidazole (12 mg/L) with the presence of the plasmid pCD-METRO. In conclusion, a diverse spectrum of C. difficile strains was found in wastewater and surface water. A recently discovered plasmid-bound resistance to metronidazole was detected in C. difficile from the surface water sample. IMPORTANCE The combination of direct plating and culture after enrichment was used in order to gain a spectrum of C. difficile ribotypes present in the water samples. Toxigenic C. difficile ribotypes detected in surface water and in wastewater treatment plants overlapped with those derived from patients with CDI and/or animals. Importantly, a recently discovered plasmid-mediated resistance to metronidazole, a drug used for the treatment of CDI, was detected in C. difficile from river water.

Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Clostridioides difficile isolates in Algerian hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Clostridioides difficile is a major pathogen responsible for hospital-associated diarrhoea. This study investigated the molecular epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of C. difficile isolates in five Algerian hospitals. METHODOLOGY: Between 2016 and 2019, faecal specimens were collected from in-patients and were cultured for C. difficile. Isolates were characterised by toxin genes detection, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-ribotyping, Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST), antimicrobial susceptibility testing against a panel of antibiotics, and screened for antimicrobial resistance genes. RESULTS: Out of 300 patient stools tested, 18 (6%) were positive for C. difficile by culture, and were found to belong to 11 different ribotypes (RT) and 12 sequence types (ST): RT 085/ST39, FR 248/ST259, FR 111/ST48, RT 017/ST37, RT 014/ST2, RT 014/ST14, FR 247/new ST, RT 005/ST6, RT 029/ST16, RT 039/ST26, RT 056/ST34 and RT 446/ST58. MLST analysis assigned the isolates to two clades, 1 and 4. Clade 4 was more homogeneous, as it mainly included non-toxigenic isolates. Three toxin gene profiles were detected, two toxigenic, A+B+CDT- (33.3%) and A-B+CDT- (11%); and one non-toxigenic, A-B-CDT- (55.5%). All C. difficile isolates were susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin and moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Overall prevalence of C. difficile in our healthcare settings was 6%. Antibiotic resistance rates ranged from 72.2% (clindamycin) to 16.6% (tetracycline). This study highlighted a relatively high genetic diversity in term of ribotypes, sequence types, toxin and antibiotic resistance patterns, in the C. difficile isolates. Further larger studies are needed to assess the true extent of C. difficile infections in Algeria.

Heteroresistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in patients with a Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori can lead to treatment failure. Importantly, several studies have reported on heteroresistance, i.e. the presence of resistant and susceptible H. pylori populations in the same sample and/or a difference in the susceptibility patterns between biopsy samples. This meta-analysis aims to provide comprehensive data on the prevalence of metronidazole and clarithromycin heteroresistance and the approaches to their detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed after the search of MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. The study outcomes were the weighted pooled prevalence of heteroresistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in H. pylori positive samples and/or isolates with a subanalysis by continent. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies that had investigated 3852 H. pylori positive patients were included in the meta-analysis. Heteroresistance to clarithromycin was reported in 20 studies, with a weighted pooled prevalence of 6.8% (95% CI 5.1-8.6; 3654 H. pylori positive patients; the substantial heterogeneity I2 = 55.6%). Heteroresistance to metronidazole was reported in 12 studies, with a weighted pooled prevalence of 13.8% (95% CI 8.9-18.6; 1670 H. pylori positive patients; the substantial heterogeneity I2 = 60.9%). The weighted pooled prevalence of clarithromycin heteroresistance was similar in Asia and Europe (p = 0.174584), however, metronidazole heteroresistance was detected more often in Europe (p < 0.00001). Clarithromycin heteroresistance was detected more often by phenotype rather than by using genotyping methods (12 vs 8 studies), whereas heteroresistance to metronidazole was detected only by phenotype. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of heteroresistance to clarithromycin and/or metronidazole is not negligible and can be detected in approximately 7 and 14% of H. pylori positive samples, respectively. These findings highlight the need to raise the awareness of gastroenterologists and microbiologists to the heteroresistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in patients with a H. pylori infection.

How to: Clostridioides difficile infection in children.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are traditionally attributed to an older adult patient group but children can also be affected. Although the causative pathogen is the same in both populations, the management of CDI may differ. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the current literature on CDI in the paediatric population and to provide CDI diagnostics and treatment guidance. SOURCES: The literature was drawn from a search of PubMed from January 2017 to July 2021. CONTENT: In the paediatric population, laboratory diagnostics for CDI should preferably be combined with laboratory diagnostics for other gastrointestinal pathogens. Coinfections of CDI are also possible. Though the detection of toxigenic C. difficile using a molecular assay may simply reflect colonisation rather than infection, detection of C. difficile free toxins A/B in faeces is much more indicative of true infection. CDI in children below 2 years of age and in the absence of risk factors is very difficult to diagnose and requires careful clinical judgement pending additional studies. Fidaxomicin has been shown to be superior to vancomycin with a sustained clinical response up to 30 days after the end of CDI treatment in children. Metronidazole is less effective than vancomycin in adults and there are no supporting data for its use in children. In recurrent CDI, treatment should be adjusted according to the drug or drug regimen used for the treatment of a previous episode(s). In multiple recurrent CDI, faecal microbiota transplantation can be effective. IMPLICATIONS: If CDI laboratory testing is indicated in children with diarrhoea, the likelihood of C. difficile colonisation and coinfection with other intestinal pathogens should be considered. The currently available data support a change in the treatment strategy of CDI in children.

Clostridioides difficile epidemiology in the Middle and the Far East.

OBJECTIVES: Clostridioides difficile is an important pathogen of healthcare-associated gastrointestinal infections. Recently, an increased number of C. difficile infection (CDI) surveillance data has been reported from Asia. The aim of this review is to summarize the data on the prevalence, distribution and molecular epidemiology of CDI in the Middle and the Far East. METHODS: Literature was drawn from a search of PubMed up to September 30, 2021. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of data from 111 studies revealed the pooled CDI prevalence rate in the Middle and the Far East of 12.4% (95% CI 11.4-13.3); 48 studies used PCR for CDI laboratory diagnoses. The predominant types (RT)/sequence type (ST) differ between individual countries (24 studies, 14 countries). Frequently found RTs were 001, 002, 012, 017, 018 and 126; RT017 was predominant in the Far East. The epidemic RT027 was detected in 8 countries (22 studies), but its predominance was reported only in three studies (Israel and Iran). The contamination of vegetable and meat or meat products and/or intestinal carriage of C. difficile in food and companion animals have been reported; the C. difficile RTs/STs identified overlapped with those identified in humans. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of studies on CDI prevalence in humans from the Middle and the Far East have been published; countries with no available data were identified. The number of studies on C. difficile from non-human sources is limited. Comparative genomic studies of isolates from different sources are needed.

[Updated Czech guidelines for the treatment of patients with colitis due to Clostridioides difficile].

The updated Czech guidelines differ in some aspects from the 2021 guidelines issued by the ESCMID Study Group for Clostridium difficile. The key points of these Czech recommendations may be summarized as follows: • The drug of choice for hospitalized patients is orally administered fidaxomicin or vancomycin. In outpatients with a mild first episode of C. difficile infection, metronidazole can also be used. • If the patient's response to treatment is good and there are no complications, the duration of antibiotic treatment can be reduced (e.g. to 5 days in case of fidaxomicin or to 6-7 days in case of vancomycin). • If oral therapy is impossible, the drug of choice is tigecycline, 100 mg i.v., b.i.d., with initial shortening of the interval between the first and second doses for faster saturation. If the severity of the disease progresses during this antibiotic treatment, it is necessary to access the ileum or cecum, i.e. to perform double ileostomy or percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy, and to instill vancomycin or fidaxomicin lavages. • Fulminant C. difficile colitis should be treated with oral fidaxomicin ± tigecycline i.v. If peristalsis ceases, fidaxomicin should be administered into the ileum or cecum as described above. If sepsis develops, a broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenem) i.v. is added to topically administered fidaxomicin instead of tigecycline i.v.; at the same time, colectomy should be considered as the last resort. • To treat first recurrence, fidaxomicin or vancomycin is administered with a subsequent fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from a healthy donor. For second or subsequent recurrence, administration of fidaxomicin is of little benefit; the therapy of choice is oral vancomycin and subsequent FMT. Prolonged vancomycin or fidaxomicin taper and pulse treatment is appropriate only when FMT cannot be performed.

Motility and the genotype diversity of the flagellin genes fliC and fliD among Clostridioides difficile ribotypes.

OBJECTIVE: The motility and genotype of the flagellin fliC and fliD genes were investigated in 82 Clostridioides difficile isolates belonging to the ribotypes (RTs): 027 (n = 41), 176 (n = 17), 023 (n = 8), 017 (n = 6) and 046 (n = 10). The reference C. difficile strains 630 and M120 were included as controls for the motility assay. METHODS: A Multiple Locus Variable-number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) was used to exclude the genetic relatedness of C. difficile isolates belonging to the same RT. The variability of the fliC and fliD genes was determined by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and Sanger sequencing. The motility assay was carried out with 0.175% BHI agar tubes and BHI solid media plates with 0.4% agar. RESULTS: The highest motility was observed in C. difficile RT023 isolates (p < 0.01), followed by RTs 027 and 176. C. difficile isolates of RTs 017 and 046 were less motile than RTs 027, 176 and 023 (p < 0.01). The fliC and fliD genes were present in all clinical isolates irrespective of the motility results. In the fliC gene analysis, four different RFLP groups were identified (I, II, VII, X). The fliC group VII was identified in two RTs (027 and 176), whereas the remaining three groups (I, II and X) belonged to a single RT 046, 017 and 023, respectively. The fliD gene analysis identified four new RFLP groups (a, b, c and d). CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile RT023 is highly motile and its motility is comparable to the hypervirulent RT027 and its genetic relative RT176.

How to: screening for mcr-mediated resistance to colistin.

BACKGROUND: Colistin belongs to the last-resort antibiotics. The discovery of plasmid-bound colistin resistance mediated by the mcr-gene(s) is of great concern because, given its biological potential, there is a risk of its rapid spread. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the current literature on the methods for the screening for mcr-mediated resistance to colistin. SOURCES: Literature was drawn from a search of PubMed from 1 January 2016 to 26 April 2021. CONTENT: The selective culture-based or culture-independent approach can be used for the screening of mcr-mediated resistance to colistin in clinical samples. Rapid Polymyxin NP, Colistin Drop or Colistin Agar Spot tests are applicable for the selection of isolates with a suspected resistance to colistin that has to be confirmed by broth microdilution. The mcr-mediated resistance to colistin can be confirmed by the detection of the causal gene(s) or by phenotype using EDTA-colistin broth disc elution; production of the MCR-1 enzyme can be confirmed with lateral flow immunoassay, using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of flight or liquid chromatography-based mass spectrometry. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is the ultimate typing method. When a WGS platform is not available at a healthcare facility, a WGS-outsourced service, in combination with freely available bioinformatics tools, allows for the characterization of the mcr-gene(s) carrying isolates. IMPLICATIONS: mcr-mediated colistin resistance should be monitored through active targeted screening. The broth microdilution method is required for colistin susceptibility testing but as only a selected number of clinical isolates are tested, colistin resistance, including mcr-mediated, may remain undetected. In mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolates, the MIC to colistin can range from 2 to 8 mg/L, so it is proposed that Enterobacterales with a colistin MIC of 2 mg/L should also be included in the mcr-mediated colistin resistance screening and those with a confirmed mcr-genotype and/or MCR-phenotype should be considered to be colistin-resistant.

Tigecycline antibacterial activity, clinical effectiveness, and mechanisms and epidemiology of resistance: narrative review.

Tigecycline is unique glycylcycline class of semisynthetic antimicrobial agents developed for the treatment of polymicrobial infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Tigecycline evades the main tetracycline resistance genetic mechanisms, such as tetracycline-specific efflux pump acquisition and ribosomal protection, via the addition of a glycyclamide moiety to the 9-position of minocycline. The use of the parenteral form of tigecycline is approved for complicated skin and skin structure infections (excluding diabetes foot infection), complicated intra-abdominal infections, and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults. New evidence also suggests the effectiveness of tigecycline for the treatment of severe Clostridioides difficile infections. Tigecycline showed in vitro susceptibility to Coxiella spp., Rickettsia spp., and multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonnorrhoeae strains which indicate the possible use of tigecycline in the treatment of infections caused by these pathogens. Except for intrinsic, or often reported resistance in some Gram-negatives, tigecycline is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogens. Herein, we summarize the currently available data on tigecycline pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, its mechanism of action, the epidemiology of tigecycline resistance, and its clinical effectiveness.

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults.

SCOPE: In 2009, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published the first treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This document was updated in 2014. The growing literature on CDI antimicrobial treatment and novel treatment approaches, such as faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and toxin-binding monoclonal antibodies, prompted the ESCMID study group on C. difficile (ESGCD) to update the 2014 treatment guidance document for CDI in adults. METHODS AND QUESTIONS: Key questions on CDI treatment were formulated by the guideline committee and included: What is the best treatment for initial, severe, severe-complicated, refractory, recurrent and multiple recurrent CDI? What is the best treatment when no oral therapy is possible? Can prognostic factors identify patients at risk for severe and recurrent CDI and is there a place for CDI prophylaxis? Outcome measures for treatment strategy were: clinical cure, recurrence and sustained cure. For studies on surgical interventions and severe-complicated CDI the outcome was mortality. Appraisal of available literature and drafting of recommendations was performed by the guideline drafting group. The total body of evidence for the recommendations on CDI treatment consists of the literature described in the previous guidelines, supplemented with a systematic literature search on randomized clinical trials and observational studies from 2012 and onwards. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to grade the strength of our recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The guideline committee was invited to comment on the recommendations. The guideline draft was sent to external experts and a patients' representative for review. Full ESCMID endorsement was obtained after a public consultation procedure. RECOMMENDATIONS: Important changes compared with previous guideline include but are not limited to: metronidazole is no longer recommended for treatment of CDI when fidaxomicin or vancomycin are available, fidaxomicin is the preferred agent for treatment of initial CDI and the first recurrence of CDI when available and feasible, FMT or bezlotoxumab in addition to standard of care antibiotics (SoC) are preferred for treatment of a second or further recurrence of CDI, bezlotoxumab in addition to SoC is recommended for the first recurrence of CDI when fidaxomicin was used to manage the initial CDI episode, and bezlotoxumab is considered as an ancillary treatment to vancomycin for a CDI episode with high risk of recurrence when fidaxomicin is not available. Contrary to the previous guideline, in the current guideline emphasis is placed on risk for recurrence as a factor that determines treatment strategy for the individual patient, rather than the disease severity.